The 2020 protests following George Floyd's death (May 25, 2020) spanned 140+ cities, with significant riots in 30+ major urban centers. While 93% of demonstrations were peaceful, the riots caused unprecedented destruction.
Total Impact: $1–2B in damages, 25+ deaths, 2,000+ injuries (570+ to police), 14,000+ arrests nationwide.
Politicians and their families supported protests, often framing them as resistance to systemic racism. Critics argue this fueled riots, yet no prosecutions followed due to First Amendment protections.
Leaders and their families faced no legal consequences for rhetoric, while civilians were swiftly prosecuted for similar or lesser statements, highlighting a perceived double standard.
Why the Disparity? Politicians' vague rhetoric is protected under Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), requiring intent for imminent lawlessness. Civilians, especially from marginalized groups, face stricter scrutiny for explicit threats or protest support. Equal accountability requires consistent DOJ investigations or non-legal measures like voter pressure or ethics censures.